How would choosing between two different play styles be a good idea? Just curious. Personally I agree with everyone else about finding a middle ground by integrating both of them.

Take SFxTekken for example. Correct me if I'm wrong but it seems to play more or less exactly like SF4. The only difference is that they created a tag system with some of the Tekken cast included. I see no influence from Tekken, unless there's a TekkenxSF game that does the opposite in terms of mechanics and plays similar to Tekken. Don't get me wrong it's a great idea/mixture for a crossover, but I'm sure Capcom could have easily done it without them. The TTT series did just fine by itself. Something tells me there's some sort of pattern here with Capcom. They won't release a game with tag/teams unless it's a crossover title (i.e. Marvel vs Capcom, Capcom vs SNK, etc.).

The only exception to this, in my opinion, would probably be the KOF series. That's a totally different story. Although its original cast features characters from various fighting games, in a sense it is its own unique form of a crossover that has made a name for itself.

I know I know, I was just playing :P

Thats exactly what they are doing. Development is supposed to start once TTT2 is done.

Ah I see, thanks for clearing that up.

This'll never happen because AM2 don't like doing crossovers.

And you know this how?

Evidence or it didn't happen.

Dude. It's not gonna happen.