Search results

Makes sense. Imo, it just has to be that gauge where you developed something fun out of it. I think that's the barrier of it all. Because people can grind for something where you get nothing entirely for the outcome, but they found enjoyment out of that grind where they just keep going. For me...

Pretty much good grinding and bad ones yeah. If it's a slog, could be labeled as a bad one. But there has to be something worth it in the end to make that grind to begin with, which is what the grind normally aims for. If it's a slog and getting something that's hardly worth it, I find that to...

Could vary. I always believed that there is good grinding, while there is bad ones. Usually, it's the commitment and what you get for doing it in return. If what you get isn't worth the grind, I consider it as bad grinding. If what you get helps you in the long run and you found enjoyment with...

@Ninoasker There's proof in that lol. I play FF14, and if a tank dies, they always blame the healer LOL.

LOL

No surprise yeah.

@Brute Oh no no! I saw the trailer and saw it happened in there!

For Tekken on the other hand, it's just based on that game's format. We can't exactly mix Tekken's difficulty+character being easy/hard as the same thing because it gives people the perception that both things are the same. Some people find Tekken easy, some people find it hard. Same as DOA.

Ein/Momiji could be characters labeled a more fundamental level, but yet both characters lack depth due to just basic functions overall that other characters generally have, if not other characters have things that are just plain better. Even Gen Fu lacks depth despite a more powerful character...

I mean easy can have different meanings since it can also vary by the type of people playing the character+approach. It's usually the context and at times how much effort placed into a character. You can have an easy character with incredible depth to it because there is much things to...

I think Diego's for example is that not only is he incredibly easy to use, but the character just completely lacks depth due to the format of how DOA is. Ein suffered this problem, especially balance vs the majority of cast. I don't even think Nico is that deep either on playability and quite...

In a way easy is not really bad, but there definitely has to be a sort of depth behind it to be of importance when it comes to an easy created character. A complex / high execution character with incredible depth is like the miracle worker of hype, but requires huge time which requires dedicated...