I mean its entirely possible to study something for years and not have a full understanding of its inner workings, just ask any med student. You studying political science does not disprove the nefarious shit the CIA has done over the years to influence different regimes. Not trying to be a dick here.
It's also possible to tell people to go research shit they have no clue about themselves, but I didn't make that accusation because it's pointless.
Ideologically speaking, you said that the CIA is doing (implying current procedures) things equally horrifying as "Russia," things that are mostly going to be related to foreign policy or "national security" issues given the nature of the CIA.
I respond by citing social issues, where a single incident has some "horrifying" implications given the precedent it sets. You then acknowledge this, but somehow don't deem it all that troublesome, instead returning focus exclusively to foreign policy/national security. My point is that any strong, ruling governmental body is going to have terrible policies in that regard.
I'm not here to argue which is a better choice in that field, as they're both hard to get behind. But America has stronger social/cultural integrity than Russia. If you "chose" Russia you'd still have abhorrent foreign policy/security issues, and then you'd have regressive domestic issues stacked on top of it.
Rhetorically speaking, you've presented a false dilemma, burden of proof, confirmation bias, and countless other fallacies. Your utter refusal to present anything vaguely compelling is only compounded by your allusion that I somehow have a weaker understanding of the situation than you.
Trump aint gonna start anything with Russia. Heck it was Hillary who wanted to establish that no fly zone over syria and such. If anyone was going to cause war, it would be her. And the Cia and mainstream media are a bunch of liars. Russia hasnt done squat. It is abhorrent how much the leftist liberals have tried to tear down the results of this election.
Check out the drudge report, Ben shapiro, And alex jones is good but sometimes he just gets too crazy for my tastes. I guess Im just saying, calm down, it will be fine.
Well at least it will be painless rather than surviving the explosion but having no face but still being alive like the "ant walking aligators of hiroshima" ( don't look that up ) anyway I'm probably not helping.
Yeah, painless for me too please, I don't like to suffer and I'd probably be mind broken if I survived an explosion plus she'll shock. I'm hoping this doesn't ever come to that whatsoever
Honestly I dunno what to think about Jones. My family watches him every day, and it drives me crazy. But at the same time a lot of the news seems legit. Im just trying to find the truth man.