Free Step Dodge

Assuming characters can feel anything since their robots with only purpose is entertainment and selling merch.

Way to characterize people who don't like censorship, along with taking a design that was suppose to have bareskin and covering it like the 80s to current year like Rachel Fiend Costume (mainly NGS2+ Blue & DOA5U Purple where skin is exposed).

That second portion is literally no different than entitlement. What you wrote can also be labled as "If any portion of clothing as much as a simple sock on is added then its clearly censorship and thus, everyone must agree that it is including that it's marked fact."

So uh no. Not really. If someone has to label everything as censorship then he is the problem.

Your comment on "protagonist wears socks for cold weather" wouldn't even count since it sounds like something for storytelling (hence why I mention characterize). Not everything would need to be label censorship, you would just need to know your common gaming censorship knowledge. DOA6 Rachel Fiend & Exposure Minimization are common practices.

There is a difference between common gaming censorship and being an absolute tool seeking any sorts of grounds to be in a pedestal to control games. There is a difference between logic and no logic. There is a difference between indoctrination and no indoctrination.

That appliance isn't a big winner when most of those cases are also people that have a habit to say things that are not catered to a demographic.

Again, it's the basis of it all. If a particular design is clothed and suddenly became more clothed, there is no evidence to say that it wasn't initially designed that way. When someone screams censorship, it's either a basic truth or the typical scenario where they expect the opposite. In most cases? it's the latter. (Rachel is possible since it was also in DOA5, though not the main point directing here).

Exposure Minimization is for a minority eSports crowd. Everything else is self entitlement to things that you "believe" that you should demand or own which you don't. If you play that game, then it sounds to me that you would need to know your common gaming scenario that you can't scream censorship if a certain outfit was initially designed that way.

I wouldn't be surprised if some of "those" fans would have a foot fetish.

The whole "control games" comment mainly apply to journalists (IGN, Kotaku, Gamespot etc.) & game platforms (Sony, Valve, Apple etc.) since one would want certain content to be taken out by writing articles (using social media), and another that can deny them to be on their platform.