That's not what I asked you. Smh. I asked you what would you call hitting someone up off the ground if they stay laid out. Did you even read my comment? See this is the problem: You come in to to correct me, but when I [ask] for an answer, I get nothing. You seem to not understand how frustrating that is, and an argument is different from a discussion, which I'm trying to have with you since you're giving "help" and "enlightenment", yet I'm getting no help.
Is it me? Am I wrong for asking questions? Please. Do tell. Because you haven't so far.
and in case you just... maybe can't see very well or something.
I'm asking for answers my to my questions my good sir. It'd be appreciated if I could have them since you say I'm wrong, which I never disagreed with to start.
If you're going to type in a large font, at least double check for typos.
Now, I already told you before that what you typed up earlier explaining what force techs are was inaccurate. I gave you a clear example of what a force tech is and how it works (this is what I'm trying to enlighten you on). But you still seem to have it that what you typed before is still somewhat correct (people here just can't seem to admit when they're wrong for some reason).
Combo'ing someone just to followup with a low or something in hopes of an opponent not techrolling is not performing a force tech. It is not a force get up or whatever you're calling it. It's just hitting them while they are on the ground. Performing a force tech (like in the example I gave earlier) is eliminating all guessing on an opponent's wakeup. You don't back up out of fear of a wakeup kick, you force them off the ground immediately and can continue to be the aggressor while being at advantage.
There isn't any reason for me to answer anything else because it's irrelevant.