Skilletor
Active Member
Not true. It could just not be punishable. Something at -3 would be a safe attack, but wouldn't grant frame advantage.
DOA5 E3 Version Q&A
- Thread starter DrDogg
- Start date
Not true. It could just not be punishable. Something at -3 would be a safe attack, but wouldn't grant frame advantage.
Jefffcore
Well-Known Member
But when you say unsafe, are you saying from throws, or just negative on block. His attack was safe from throws.
Allan Paris
Well-Known Member
Casuals wouldn't know how to work any of this no way. This discussion is apparently beyond you. TN wanting the game to have a tournament life (more than 6-16 players), means that this game (DOA5) needs to be open to game play mechanics that will provide the backbone for it to have that. So, this comment that you have made is actually 'biased' towards the goal TN is trying accomplish.
By you being here at FreeStepDodge, one can only assume you want the same thing; an offline tournament life for DOA5?
Skilletor
Active Member
Not all fingers are thumbs, but all thumbs are fingers.
I read Dr. Dogg's post as I want a safe attack that will inflict significant damage or grant frame advantage. Your argument is that he would only want one. I read it as two separate options, as he might opt for the attack that would allow him to further continue pressure.
But yes, I did misread your post.
This is a site for competitive players, and this thread is discussing things only a competitive player would care about. What are you doing here if this is all you have to add to the discussion?
I read Dr. Dogg's post as I want a safe attack that will inflict significant damage or grant frame advantage. Your argument is that he would only want one. I read it as two separate options, as he might opt for the attack that would allow him to further continue pressure.
But yes, I did misread your post.
This is a site for competitive players, and this thread is discussing things only a competitive player would care about. What are you doing here if this is all you have to add to the discussion?
D
Deleted member 473
Guest
The competitive side will not happen till release so these opinions are biased. As much as even I myself can talk about the game competitively it will have no effect on the developers, till after release.
Allan Paris
Well-Known Member
Please, stop typing.
DriftSlave
Active Member
WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT!!!!!!
are you dumb are just plain ignorant....
the changes from the Alpha demo to the E3 build were a direct result of the people from the competitive community being directly(or indirectly) involved.
If it was how you say it is....we would get DOA4 all over again with just a visual update...that's not what DOA5 is.
Edit: my bad...DOA4 + a easy mode to cater to casuals.....that sounds about right...
I can't tell if this person is successfully trolling us or just ignorant.
D
Deleted member 473
Guest
What? Im given the right to my opinion.
DriftSlave
Active Member
Not when you present your opinion as fact....
Rikuto
P-P-P-P-P-P-POWER!
1. After release it doesn't matter much what you want, because the game is released. and patch time/count is limited.
2. They read more than you may think.
Allan Paris
Well-Known Member
Yes, you are given that right. However, the things you are posting at this moment are counter-productive in this discussion. You are walking on the lines of trolling, and in some eyes you are trolling. To prevent you from trolling further, I am asking you to stop, while you are ahead.
DriftSlave
Active Member
Not to go too off topic but, you think we would be able to get balance patches later on down the line?
D
Deleted member 473
Guest
I promise you I heard that the game will receive responses to the Hardcore's AFTER the game released? am I wrong?
Rikuto
P-P-P-P-P-P-POWER!
I don't even know what this sentence means.
But an answer given to the general public to calm the masses is not the same as gospel truth of how the world works. They are not engineering a game with the goal of pissing off either side of the fence.
DriftSlave
Active Member
*where is the dislike button?*
Shinigamimatt
Active Member
Actually, now that you mention it, how long would TN patch DOA5 with updates after the game is released? Even if DOA5 isn't perfect, there's always time to update, right? They could listen to payer feedback after the game comes out and update as appropriate.
Skilletor
Active Member
Wouldn't it be better to start with a great game rather than hope the game gets fixed after? what if the game bombs horribly and they don't think it's worth it to patch a game very few people are playing? Then we're stuck with a shitty game because people like you think it's better to keep your mouth shut.
D
Deleted member 473
Guest
I just feel like our comments are not getting to them