Free Step Dodge

Less not wanting to do it whatsoever, more its usually bad timing or just not right to do it. I like to think with my brain not my dick so I think it through before accepting or refusing

So if you're bad at DOA you're a sub and if you're good at it you're a dom? Somehow that manages to be more ridiculous than the aggressive vs defensive theory.

And in my experience... those that see sex as a distraction often times enjoy it the most and seek it out more than someone that wouldn't.

No Brute. You can be good at DOA, win a match or lose a match and feel sexual tension after the match. For me I can be either or. I've gotten aroused after winning and losing.

I don't personally feel that winning or losing is a power thing when it comes to video games. When I fight someone I'm attracted to (rare) I'm in it to win it and like I said I'm very submissive.

Logically speaking, with the words you chose to articulate the idea, that does not make sense. For example: "...to find out if you are..." implies adherence to one end of the dichotomy, not "... if you would be..." which would imply that classification is variable depending on who the individual interacts with. The latter is logically coherent, whereas the former is not.

Though if you're really interested, I imagine it would be easier to evaluate their P/J preference in relation to yours. The correlation would undoubtedly be more compelling, albeit still with standard variance.

Well I didn't mean don't try if you are submissive...

No, Brute -- you are right it was a poorly addressed.

I feel bad for the people in the beginning of this getting swarmed by notifications

I don't feel anything sexual if I lose or win.

If I see Kasumi's winposes, I get this embarrassed feeling, like if your crush walks by, but that's the most I usually feel in that regard.

Wow - ok. I just prt scr this whole thing. It is fun watching. @Chapstick I didn't mean vanilla/kink. I was trying to tease out the definition of "sex." (cont).

After watching this comment chain it's clear that sexuality is not just a behavior but a language which constructs an identity - the idea of individualized sexuality is super important from what I'm reading. But I feel the discussion itself may be limiting the language of human sexuality into sub/dom. (cont)

It's possible to feel both, none or something way different but still sexual.

Sidenote for the longest time I thought deathofaninja was talking about sexual tension from his opponent. It would make more sense to me. Not that feeling sexual tension from your avatar doesn't make sense to me.

Just the @Chapstick part is to chapstick. Everything after cont. was meant for the general comment chain

I don't think anyone was suggesting sexuality was strictly binary to the point were everyone was exclusively either sub or dom. But the distinction is used as a generalized concept to express shared understanding of certain traits. For example, there is no explicit threshold at which point someone becomes "tall" or "short," and yet the terms are still used liberally,

even in studies and theories, to observe shared variables. Sub and dom can be viewed the same way.

No, whether or not that has anything to do with playing someone in a fighting game is an entirely different matter.

^ Like. At time of writing 16,760; 16,760 +1.

I forget how many likes I've horded in my time here...