its the same reaction every time it doesn't matter. these nut jobs fight any type of inclusion tooth and nail and if it was based on religion i could at LEAST understand it, but i can't make sense of this behavior.
"Games featuring any form of SJW pandering such as female empowerment (both sexually deprived "we are all sluts!" feminism and sex-negative "did you look at my ass? Raep!" feminism)...
racial replacement (generally white being replaced for black or asian), sexual fetiches (bestiality, homosexualism, incest between adults etc.), among other trending topics should have an SJW seal in similar size & style of the ESRB rating."
In truth, some of the people there(including myself) don't have a problem with Tracer being gay. What people have a problem with is that Blizzard made such a ridiculous announcement about it months back about one of their characters being gay. It just comes off as tasteless pandering rather than something to add to a character.
Tasteless pandering would be putting in Anita Sarkeesian - the SJW to end all SJWs - as a guest character.
Tasteless pandering would be removing Roadhog from the roster because SJWs think he looks similar to the average horny orc you see in certain hentai anime.
Tasteless pandering would be covering up Symmetra's legs for no reason. Her long, beautiful legs... *ahem*
Except HOW they was building up to Tracer being LGBT was tasteless pandering. They was clearly trying to hype it up the second someone asked months ago and then when they finally unveiled it, they then stated that there was going to be more LGBT revealed characters from now.
pandering is just fine as long as its not to any gays apparently. you know what else is tasteless pandering? pretty much the entirety of DOA, but no thats different. its fine when when its targeted towards you.
yeah its pandering we fucking know that, its also the only way we get any representation because pandering is just another term for "trying to appeal to" and i see nothing wrong with that.