Search results

Sometimes. It may sound like crazy talk right now but actually I'm fairly certain Bayman shits all over Akira TBH. The risk reward seems to be in favor of Bayman a lot more. But thats mostly because Akira players rely on the whole "high jab low jab high jab low jab" bullshit to keep up frame...

I try. Let me you ask you this... what do you think happens when Akira, Sarah, or Pai fights Helena in a tournament?

I think DOA 5 has at least as many characters that are viable in tournament play as MVC2 does. Probably a few more.

They won't give a public response in all likelihood. Not this close to release -- everything is going to be kept as positive as possible. This is probably considered negative hype and I probably already pissed them off with my comment about the Japanese players. But you know, it's like... a...

Mali will probably have to do a double take on seeing me say this, but I actually think female gamers in the FGC get a lot more respect than they actually deserve most of the time. In my experience, anything they can do is immediately several times more important then anyone else of the same...

According to some people, yes.

.... Why do I get like 90% more Likes when I'm being a negative asshole? You guys don't really do much to encourage me to be a more positive individual.

After seven years of waiting for that drink, yes. Yes you would be.

It's not so much that I see my glass as half empty. It's that I had a full glass, and ten random Japanese guys that nobody in the world has ever heard of started sipping out of it. You can call that half-empty or half-full, but either way I'm going to be pissed off over the theft.

..... You guys can twist the English language all day long, the game still isn't getting any better. I mean I'm sure you know... just... reminding you.

I would have preferred it that way myself, but someone apparently felt that having a highly interruptable OH that does like 35-40 damage was too overpowered.

The ten people in Japan who claim to actually play this game also happen to disagree with us on nearly everything. Guess who gets priority. Anyway I intend to have a nice, long chat with Shimbori-san in the near future about some of this...

So in other words, you would like to argue semantics, not actual viability. Alright... well, semantics are good and fun and I can respect that, but I'm not really up for arguing them.

3.1 > 3.2 > 3.0 All decent games, however.

To be honest, I think you're simply throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks. The game was bad competitively, thus people did not enjoy playing it in a competitive environment (even when they did go, it was for money and not game itself as can be widely attested by anyone in...

Except the vast majority of the community does hate it. If we didn't, this topic wouldn't exist. Paradox. And if a game is not being played due to its faulty gameplay system, it is not a competitively viable game. To be competitive means to compete with OTHER PEOPLE, and you can't compete...