You know, by the early 2000s, DOA3 was probably the only fighting game I knew that didn't show hit levels. I thought that was very very silly and unhelpful.
Team Ninja Twitter
- Thread starter Raansu
- Start date
Raansu
Well-Known Member
Doh *sticks head in ground for not noticing the obvious*
Those initial and recovery frames seem really high. Are those the numbers for a power blow?
Seems like perhaps Hitomi hit a half wall then. Then again, that would say 10 damage with a 50% revision, wouldn't it?
"The DOA5 button layout. I'm sure you've seen this covered in previous tweets."
Unshaken Faith
New Member
Just stumbled on this while browsing the main page's twitter feed. Not sure but the poster[@homimakku] seems to say that there will be a new DOA5 trailer monday.
A proper translation will be appreciated, don't wanna get my hopes up.
Several tweets in a row, all seem to about DOA5. I'm butchering the tweets but I am trying my best considering I don't speak any Japanese outside of a few phrases.
Despite my horrible translation, it looks like Team Ninja is seriously considering people for getting their input on DOA5. This is great news! Unless, of course, they send Master again. Then we're doomed.
Allan Paris
Well-Known Member
How come they don't have these tweets posted in english as well? Thanks for your efforts though, grap3.
Relius Starkiller
Active Member
I'm going to start pestering Team Ninja to keep the online mode the way it is. (I.e All matches are ranked)
I think it would be a huge mistake to take the game down the same online path as every other fighter.
I think it would be a huge mistake to take the game down the same online path as every other fighter.
I don't know about that. The online mode could definitely use some improvement. I really like Soul Calibur 5's method of ranking where you get points whether or not you win, you just get significantly more if for winning and they aren't taken away from you for losing. DOA's method seems kind of harsh and discouraging towards newer players. I think giving players even something for losing and telling them they can get more for doing better is much more of an incentive to play than just punishing people right out the gate. This really isn't the thread for that discussion however.
Relius Starkiller
Active Member
Not a bad i idea, but I'd rather not have a bunch of hohum players whos volume of play artificially inflates their letter grade.
God knows we have enough C- players who glitched to SS and ended up rubber stamping an S on a lot of subpar players.
Anyway, I'll just create a thread to discuss this issue because I really don't thinks its one thats touched upon enough.
God knows we have enough C- players who glitched to SS and ended up rubber stamping an S on a lot of subpar players.
Anyway, I'll just create a thread to discuss this issue because I really don't thinks its one thats touched upon enough.
Arnell Long
Active Member
Like you stated grap3, I think the players should be giving an "Option" on which event to tackle online. I myself is a "legit" SS on one Account that isn't functional anymore and a S on my recent one, but 80% of the time I rather play "Non-ranked" matches, definitely with friends. Relius, games have evolved, us as players should be giving a choice, not forced into something such as Ranked. I know not one "right minded" player who would prefer only "Ranked" when they visit a online match.
Rikuto
P-P-P-P-P-P-POWER!
The points given to you in soul calibur are not used for ranking though, just unlocking content.
All matches done online, even casual ones, are kept on record. There is no difference.