Chaos
Well-Known Member
There...I fix it for you.But the 360 does suck..compared to PC
There...I fix it for you.But the 360 does suck..compared to PC
Lol so im guessing i was right by your response which was the same thing you stated on the first page only about nintendo. I love how some fanboys have justify there consoles the greatest because thats the one they own.
I have them both too. I have more games on 360 than PS3 only because xbox 360 (Imo) has the better games selection, but Sony always have supported the fighting game competitive scene even though DOA4 & MK was 360's competitive fighting games, which is why I buy nothing but fighting or sports to PS3 & nothing else but maybe COD to both consoles. I buy fighting games to both consoles regardless because that's what I play most of the time.I think the whole console war thing is childish and its the games that make a console great not the consoles themselves. I own every console for there exclusives and i just happen to play all my fighting games on the PS3. I just feel the PS3 has the larger and longer lasting fighting game communities for the most part. My next game will be on the 360 however when i pick up Halo 4.
Stupid fanboys are brainwashed to understand that.I have them both too. I have more games than 360 than PS3 only because xbox 360 (Imo) has the better games selection, but Sony always have supported the fighting game competitive scene even though DOA4 was 360's competitive fighting game, which is why I buy nothing but fighting or sports to it & nothing else but maybe COD to both consoles.
But I agree with you. The whole console war is just bullshit. Play what you play & enjoy it! Simple as that!
Yeah they are. Especially on youtube. "360 vs PS3" "Tekken vs DOA" "COD vs Battlefield" "MK vs SF" "SF vs KFO" just childish shit. All of them are good games, I have my favorites out of all of them, but am I gonna argue over the shit? Fuck no!Stupid fanboys are brainwashed to understand that.
Im wondering if thats because there are noticeably more people playing online on the PS3 version.I have them both, but I've gotta say I've been having trouble just even getting a match or even making a lobby.. quite frank, trouble in general on 360. PS3, I've had some delays, but I've been getting matches. Good thing I don't take online serious any more like I used to.
don't know I was thinking the same thing. I spent 3 or 4 hours on 360 today & yesterday before changing over to PS3. Yesterday, I didn't get ANY matches on 360 & got a bunch on PS3. Even got 3 hate msgs lol.. Today, I got only 2 matches & spent like 5 hours playing & practicing with my main character. I got PS3 hooked up nowIm wondering if thats because there are noticeably more people playing online on the PS3 version.
In theory, the fastest output is the 3rd frame.
Sure. 3 frames at 120fps is faster than 3 frames at 60fps, which is faster than 3 frames at 30 fps. Because of how the hardware cycles work, that's how it goes. Three frames. Theoretically of course. You can't process the CPU cycles and the GPU cycles in the same frame because the CPU needs to be done before the GPU can render anything. Why is 60 fps preferred over 30fps? Because of the faster minimally possible response time. Even if it stays three frames for both, you have a fastest response time of 50ms at 60fps and 100ms at 30fps. Both are three frames.I'm having a hard time understanding how you can measure universal input delay with a frame count of 3. What if I'm running a game at 120fps, or 30fps, or 15 fps? The idea that there is some kind of universal rule that the frame count for lag is always a minimum of 3 doesn't add up to me, as it suggests the measured MS for response time will always vary with your framerate.
Both of them are damn good to me. They've got pros & cons on both ends. Since there's a bunch of people that keep making this dumb argument, as much I hate to do this, I'll break down facts:It doesnt matter to me im still enjoying the PS3 version and the console fanboys can bash the PS3 version all they want its not going to stop me from playing.
Xbox 360: Overall, it's a fact 360 has a better game selection.
Well it's about what you prefer, but it's dumb to argue about it. That's my point I'm trying to makeUnless you're gonna talk strictly about multiplayer games, overall game selection (single and multi-) is better on PS3. People flock to X360 because of the higher popularity of multiplayer games (ex: COD, Halo, Gears, etc) on that system. PS3 has more high profile exclusive titles (not counting XBLA/PSN releases or Kinect shovelware) than X360.
IMO, it's like this. X360 is better for multiplayer gaming, PS3 is better for single-player gaming. And if a particular gamer wants to play all or most of this gen's high profile games, he/she would ideally own both consoles.