Well i mean she's not. On account of the whole lack of fur and all that. There's a tail and ears, that's about it. That's what I mean. If just that constitutes "furry", then that's a gross overgeneralization.
oh wait scratch there, there's two pictures of carrot and a couple of the kobold girl from that monster musume manga. So there's that. *scrolls through gallery* three of a nurse squirrel because it was a cute character design, not particularly "Sexualized" though. The rest is mostly digimon...
It's because you are acting fucking retarded. I like Makoto because her dialogue is funny, i like "strong" girls, and she's a badass in combat. her outfit is dumb as hell, too overly stripperish, and I don't know who Renka is. I have pictures of "hypersexualized" GIRLS, on facebook. Other...
I literally don't engage in any "furry" stuff. have no interest in "furries". But I drew a fox girl OC, so therefore i'm labeled as "furry". that's not me "being dense" or "playing dumb". that's me being annoyed at an offensive generalization.
like I don't have "Furry" personas or profiles or any of that crap. I'm not into "furry" stuff, it creeps me out. But I do have a fox girl OC, so I'm automatically a "furry"?
I dunno, I see "Furry" as like when people draw sexualized versions of Pokemon.
I was fully aware my OC would be...
I think it just bugs me that people simply think "cartoon animal" instantly means "Furry". Furry usually refers to the sexual deviancy side, like again, when people draw Renamon/Daisy Duck/Minnie Mouse in lingerie with huge tits, which creeps me the hell out.
Like I've been called a "furry"...
even that pic is a specific character I like. I don't like it because there's a tail, I like it because I like that character. She IS a tomboy, so there's that, I admit.
^To you maybe. You implied im a furry when I talked about DW9, and i've been wondering about it since. Like is it just because my profile pic is a fox girl OC? I don't see it as any more "furry" than animaniacs or Darkwing Duck. I've never shown any specific interest in anthros over non...
right? To me it's just "cartoon character". I only see "furry" as like when someone draws Renamon with huge tits or something. Deliberately sexualizing what's otherwise a non sexual cartoon animal.
@UpSideDownGRUNT no, MGSV just has Gundams, ipods in the 80s, Thor style lightning strike powers, etc etc.
TBH even MGS1 had turret segments, so its not like it's a strike against MGS4 for having some too.
MGS4 leaned too much on cutscenes, especially second half of the game, but it was still...
Loved ORC, one of the only RE games I would just replay over and over and over. SPECIFICALLY I loved the characters and they are too good to waste and would fit into a RE2make nicely.
i'm just hoping they add in stuff from later games that built off Raccoon City, like finding Kevin's gun in his desk in RCPD from Outbreak, and adding in Ada's Escape from Umbrella Chronicles as a new Hunk style scenario. I'd love to see the ORC cast integrated into canon as well.
Ouch. I been playing pirate and hyrule warriors which were both way better than a standard dw gameplay wise but not as much content. Then dw9 iis looking worse and worse