Search results

That's ironic considering that I'm only parroting your own language. To say that my point was merely a superfluous explanation is to imply that it missed the point of your argument (ie: your point went over my head). But fair enough. I'm not really into debating with that kind of hypocrisy, myself.

If they're at such a low stage in their development and choose to show something off, it's usually because they're very proud of the particular feature or aspect that they are showcasing, and wish that to be a framing device to allow the public to focus on what they wish to be the focus. The...

Critical assessment is how I have fun. Can you stop acting like I'm obliged to be a brainless optimist in the face of zero evidence?

That's literally a long winded way of saying that the point flew over your head. Well, yes. That peak, as dictated by determinism, is that your opponent would be utterly shut-down every time they pressed a button. Pretty scary potential ceiling. Again, DOA does give huge payouts for certain...

Maybe you are. The fact that you have four options on four hit levels alone means that it's more involved than "pure RPS," let alone the numerous other considerations. I understand that what you're trying to say is that it's purely anticipation so you can't read enemy movements and the like...

The whole point of stun is to skew subsequent RPS exchanges in favor of the attacker, rewarding consecutive victories. If you don't feel confident about outsmarting your opponent, you can opt for stun-launch to reduce that chain with lower risk. Many people don't do this because they like...

So you have to keep playing RPS in a game based around RPS, but each time you are successful the opponent loses points and has a much lower chance of winning the next bout? Horrifying. Oh, I hate having to read my opponent. I wish I could just take a break!

I think if they reduced the stun threshold then limiting a defender to one hold per critical stun period might be interesting.

Personally, I care more about charisma than narrative points. Hayate isn't boring because he's "the weakest of the ninjas." He could be the strongest character in the canon and he'd still be an insufferable brick wall. All I hope to see from DOA6 story-wise is for characters to feel invigorated...

Easy is not necessarily good. I like a good stance. Ongyoin just isn't one.

So we can expect better improvements from 5 to 5U than from 5 to 6? Yay. They wouldn't even have to make new moves/notations, per-se. For example, they could give Hayabusa his old 236K attack/input back. They could revert his 3H+K attacks to either how they were in 5 vanilla or how they were in...

There are plenty of people who have naturally blonde hair as children only to have it darken later in life.

God, they really didn't change a single fucking thing in Hayabusa's moveset, did they?