Can't believe with "complex and hard-hitting fighting mechanics" and "stable online play," they knocked almost 3 points off for story mode. Why do I have a hunch Tecmo didn't pony up as much as Namco... :Genfu:Some asshole said:The Good:
-Complex and hard-hitting fighting mechanics
-Stable online play
-Smooth character animations
The Bad:
-Poorly executed educational mode
-Sorting replays is a chore
They only had enough to pay IGN lol.for story mode. Why do I have a hunch Tecmo didn't pony up as much as Namco... :Genfu:
http://t.co/8ej2iT63 this one states we haven't played with Fu since DOA3.
http://t.co/vIZzb72Q this one says he's from VF.
That's your quality over there.
I actually write reviews in my blog at www.mikenieto.blogspot.com and try to be as objective and play the game for a much as possible before writing. This "main media" reviews just make me want to vomit. Another article somewhere is bashing DOA5 for using three buttons because "it doesn't allow as many options as Tekken" but in the same site the VF5 review states they did a wonderful job at simplifying everything with just three buttons. What a fucking joke. This is why Call of Duty sells so much.
Thanks. I originally created it to keep a personal diary of my gaming/anime/collecting activities but after being witness to the rapid decline in game reviews I noticed many community members were much better at it than the main media sites and magazines so since I'm studying to be a writer I decided to put my grain of sand.
You'll probably notice a few mistakes in some of them, especially with the grammar but you have to know I'm from Latin America so writing in English is somewhat tricky for me.
Anyway, I don't think anybody should pay any attention to these reviews. It's sad because they're gonna scare a lot of people away from the game.