SIDESTEPElaborate on Akira's 6-4 vs Kokoro?
My experience with Tengu
vs Alpha 6-4
Playing vs Alpha is almost comical.
4 paragraphs and not a single legitimate contribution to MU discussion.
If the Sarah-Bass match-up is 7-3 than so is the Sarah-Tengu. The only real difference is that Tengu's P+K is faster.
You'd be surprised how fun it is trolling around with Nyo when your fighting alpha
If you're not incredibly knowledgeable about the game then you really have no place to be saying that Alpha is underpowered, overpowered or really anything, nor are you in a position to contribute to meaningful MU discussion. People's intuitive experience is often mis-representative, which is why it requires extensive game knowledge and extensive MU experience in order to accurately analyze, asses and discuss MUs and Tiers.I'm so tired of this, Brute! I'm not as knowledgeable as I have already stated, so I described what I thought as best I could!
Well, that on itself is not enough since they are both extremely linear and can both be sidestepped easily.SIDESTEP
Akira's SS attacks are more potent than Kokoro's.Well, that on itself is not enough since they are both extremely linear and can both be sidestepped easily.
As Brute said, he has potent SS attacks, and his 214P+K should be enough to dissuade sidesteppers most of the time. He nets equal or better damage than Kokoro does, has a number of guaranteed setups, has guard breaks which are relatively fast (and he's only hit for counter, not HiC, if the opponent's attack is faster than the guard break. Kokoro's heichu throw is garbage in comparison). He's also equally fast and has a high & low punch parry. If that's not enough, his 64T, if properly executed, deals 117 damage on HiC without a wall, so he beats Kokoro out in throw damage as well.Elaborate on Akira's 6-4 vs Kokoro?
If you're not incredibly knowledgeable about the game then you really have no place to be saying that Alpha is underpowered, overpowered or really anything, nor are you in a position to contribute to meaningful MU discussion. People's intuitive experience is often mis-representative, which is why it requires extensive game knowledge and extensive MU experience in order to accurately analyze, asses and discuss MUs and Tiers.
I'm not trying to be mean or bully you, but many of us have extensive game knowledge and a ton of valid experience. So when you make some generalized statements that don't go into tech or specifics and simply reference some casual experiences you've had in online play and these are contra to the observations we've made and researched diligently and then openly admit that your knowledge is limited, you shouldn't be surprised that people don't consider that a valid contribution to MU discussion.
No, I'm saying that you should go increase your knowledge and gain enough MU experience before trying to correct others who have already done so.No, you're saying I shouldn't have an opinion regardless of how ignorant (as you seem to be implying or worse, you rather fight me than help)!
This is precisely the issue. A tier list is not a casual discussion. If you do not have a competitive, in-depth, knowledgeable and experienced perspective, you cannot contribute to a real tier list discussion.research be damned! I don't wanna make like gurus "show off," but it wouldn't surprise me if they did! The hardcore/casual divide, you know? I want help, but you rather do is put me down! Yes, I bitch, but nothing happens if one doesn't or have you not noticed? It's crap like this in any community that turns people off!
If you want help using Alpha, that's what the Alpha boards are for.I know generalities, but can they lead to specifics that an help me understand my character better? You keep saying, it's a design flaw! I fucking get it! Is there anything I can specifically do to deal with it? I'm doing the best with what I have in terms of what I know! Can anybody will anybody? It seems to be clear you won't! (I was not even talking to you to begin with; yet, you so kindly interjected yourself into the conversation!)