i feel u don't know what a male chauvinist is i truly doubt u understand the definition of the phrase only because most of the guys on here are asking for equality amongst the characters outfits please refrain from chastising people with a lack of/ incorrect knowledge
http://www.freestepdodge.com/threads/petition-for-more-dude-clothes.3442/one lerson even made a petition for no more girls costumes
They said this in the very first post, unless you're talking about someone else.I luv my girls and hope we get a lot more for them, but I don't want the guys to be neglected. I hope we'll get more for them too
We need more manly stages...Burai Zenin, anyone?
I definitely miss the old stages. One of the reasons why I loved DoA 2-4 is because unlike every other fighting game the stages weren't boring old rings. They were just cool locations. For example seaside market wasn't a fighting ring set in a market setting, you just literally had fights in middle of an actual market.
Would you rather someone sandbag instead of playing their best?
If the opponent is obviously completely outclassed by their best, yes. At least in a non tourney match.
http://www.freestepdodge.com/threads/petition-for-more-dude-clothes.3442/
No, they didn't. They made a petition for more guy clothes. Chauvinist pig!
They said this in the very first post, unless you're talking about someone else.
"A real loser is someone who's so afraid of not winning, they don't even try."
-Grandpa (Little Miss Sunshine)
It's not about winning. It's about knowledge. If I play someone and they purposefully limit themselves, I don't know their real options and the real risk/reward of those options. That means that I'll develop bad habits for dealing with certain situations. And that is very bad, especially if I'm learning a new game. Plus, what's the point of winning if the other guy isn't even trying? "Oh, yeah, I beat up Colpevole in Persona! Huh? Oh, it looks like he was playing with his feet." I'd feel terrible.If the opponent is obviously completely outclassed by their best, yes. At least in a non tourney match.
@Rachel the fiend Slayer: Quit trying to start stuff a real chauvinist would most likely not even play a game where half of the cast is female with many having similar/greater abilities then the males.
Guys, do yourselves a favor and just stick Rachel on ignore. I did it some time ago and my number of eye rolls have dropped substantially ever since.
Also, if you're not the type of person who when beaten would look back at replays and see what you did wrong and instead would complain and quit, you're not the type of person who would have fun with fighting games anyways.
Fighting can't be the best thing we need right now
It's not about winning. It's about knowledge. If I play someone and they purposefully limit themselves, I don't know their real options and the real risk/reward of those options. That means that I'll develop bad habits for dealing with certain situations. And that is very bad, especially if I'm learning a new game. Plus, what's the point of winning if the other guy isn't even trying? "Oh, yeah, I beat up Colpevole in Persona! Huh? Oh, it looks like he was playing with his feet." I'd feel terrible.
Also, if you're not the type of person who when beaten would look back at replays and see what you did wrong and instead would complain and quit, you're not the type of person who would have fun with fighting games anyways.