At least Team Ninja is trying to satisfy my cravings.
New DOA5 version announced (Momiji!!!)
- Thread starter synce
- Start date
- Status
Where did u get that character select screen?
they made it,its not real
Raansu
Well-Known Member
You call DoA4 and 5 evolving? More like going backwards.
D
Deleted member 473
Guest
You're only talking about combat evolving, I get it. But when you have people like Grape say, "TN should go back to DOA 3.1" Its like he saying the ENTIRE game..... And that's the part that aggravates me.
Raansu
Well-Known Member
No...he's talking about the mechanics.
D
Deleted member 473
Guest
Oh ok.
Julius Rage
Well-Known Member
Both of these guys are on coke.
Look 4 was an evolution and a step forward and grape does in fact want a re-release of DOA3.1.
But who the fuck wants to play DOA.with.3 point countering? I've played it and it's good but not the holy grail.
Then again I'm called gay because I like girls who do anal so the world is full of fuck heads.
I'd be pretty pissed if doa went back to the 3point hold system. People random hold as it is and in doad it was a nightmare
Why in the world do people like the three point hold?
Julius Rage
Well-Known Member
Newer players can go High tier.
P1naatt1ke1tt0
Active Member
An i30 launcher would be interesting also in another way: You know how you can delay a critical burst a little so that even if they hold it correctly, it hits later, in the recovery frames, and the counter hold whiffs? This could increase attacker advantage similarly, if they try holding your launcher too soon! = less guess-based escape chances for defender.
I always loved when I played doad and I'd counter someone and I'd say I thought they were gonna do a mid punch when in reality I held their mid kick because of the three point hold. I was so turned off by the doa5 demo because of it. If doa ever went back to a three point hold I'd probably quit.
DR2K
Well-Known Member
Makes more sense logically than to just seperate mids, but it would only work out if it couldn't be done out of deep stuns.
System becomes more coherent and learning combos becomes more streamlined.
Raansu
Well-Known Member
It only worked in older DoA's because throws were half the speed they are now and did twice the damage plus a multitude of other things. In the current stun heavy BS we have, a 3 point hold system would just be a nightmare...So I say no thanks to that shit.
Dutch Samurai
Active Member
What DR2K said. It never made sense to me that they singled out mid strike hold inputs, separating hold inputs for punches and kicks, without also doing it for the holding of high and low strikes as well (6-point). To me, 3-point hold is just more of an intuitive system. They just need to tighten the window of opportunity, to discourage mid-hold spamming and make holding in deep stun impossible.
Raansu
Well-Known Member
The reason it was separated is because the majority of attacks are in fact mids.
Dutch Samurai
Active Member
I know. But still seems counter-intuitive from the standpoint that a grab is a grab and the fact that mid strikes are the most common doesn't negate that. Whether I'm grabbing an arm or a leg, it's the same motion. So I think the game input should reflect that. Like I said, tighten the threshold so that spammers will be punished.
- Status