Search results

I saw no mention of PLs/PBs in the IGN article. Everything that looks like a PB in the trailer, is most likely Break Blow.

It's GameFAQs, did we expect any better.

If there's one major tournament that many have hoped that Dead Or Alive 5 would have had a presence in, it's none other than Evo. Now, Dead Or Alive 5: Last Round is finally making it to the big game. DOA series producer Yosuke Hayashi and director Yohei Shimbori have posted the ff. message...

If you Reversal Edge, the other guy has the chance to take out 25% or more of your life bar.

How would you tie this in the the match-up chart that people have compiled over the years?

Except Reversal Edge's risk/reward make it almost DOA4 levels of bad.

Was talking with Crow about that before he wrote the article. They're basically the most problematic thing alongside how bad Reversal Edge seems to be. As he wrote down, it does seem that turtling and just waiting to react once you see something on screen with the super can be pretty viable...

It's going nowhere because we keep going in circles. It all comes back to you saying that you don't like the fact that a player gains an advantage for doing certain things that reward them with a resource and more options (which is the point of meter).

Here's hoping they've realized why people keep coming back to SC2 and give us back good frame data and step-guard or a similar mechanic. Namco spent the past 3 games trying to make a game without the stuff that made SC2 work, and it's high time they just went back to it.

Because "unbalanced" in limited doses is interesting. Let's take a look at Super Street Fighter II Turbo, a game that people would put in the more "interesting" end of the spectrum (opposite Street Fighter V, which is on the other end). Super Turbo is far from the most balanced Street Fighter...

Then you end up with just some variation of Street Fighter II, in much the same way many of the fighting games from the early nineties were basically thought of as variants of SFII. It's telling that the most common way that most games from that era differentiated themselves, was by using...

Because they give a game a unique identity and helps define a specific game plays. This is both in terms of aesthetics (with a lot of these meter powered moves can be pretty flashy), and more importantly in terms of gameplay - as how a game's meter management works gives it more of an identity...

What makes that any different from a meaningful choice? Choosing to do one thing means you may get the reward for it, at the cost of the ability to do. The choice has meaning precisely because of what you gain and what you lose out on when you do it. Having an obvious right and wrong decision...

Because meter management actually makes games more interesting, and the choices more meaningful. Most meter powered options are good because, aside from doing more damage, they also provide more utility. With good meter design and a variety of meter powered moves, you end up with a situation...

The question is, if all this is true, is if Bamco will finally admit that taking out Step-G post SC2 and all the tweaks made to make the game work without it is what's made almost all installments post SC2 be problematic from a gameplay point of view.

Need to mention that this, so far, doesn't have mouse support.

Balancing based on what scrubs can't deal with.

This is one of the basic tricks that veterans tell newcomers to use when coming into KoF. Because the timing difference between getting a short hop and a regular jump is just a few frames during a characters pre-jump frames.

With each passing year, Halloween becomes less and less about dressing in "scary" costumes, and more about just going around in costume.

IS MAHVEL BAYBEE!