Search results

There are some stupid things in both. There are some excellent things in both. It's why I love 3d fighters (More so for the excellent things. The stupid things can find a hole and fall in it). But I strongly advise to please not bash either. If it's not for someone, it's not for someone. I can't...

And yes I do bash both games. I'm a competitor, I hate losing, and I always voice my opinion. But, when I get to the nitty gritty, I don't hate DOA. I don't hate Tekken. Both are great games and a great challenge for me as I'm trying to be one of the best pure 3d fighters (Hopefully VF comes...

@Bacaww Yup. I do. But there's times where I have to say something. Because I see promise in both games (Especially since DOA6's on the horizon). And it's unfortunate when I have people who have no idea what they're talking about try to bash both games. It's like when they tried to talk about my...

But I can't go behind a random who played DOA for like 2 days and say "DOA's easy. That's why Tekken's the better game. Cause it's harder. More advanced." That's just plain ignorant.

I play 2d's simple so I feel those are simple games to me. But I can understand those who dive deep into those and look to the complexity of their respected games. Same to me with DOA & Tekken. Now this doesn't mean there aren't simple characters or you can't play the game simple. That's why...

Now, this isn't aimed for those who play both legit or anyone who plays in a tournament scenario. Then by all means, speak your piece. But after that, the best way I'm going to put it is like this: If you play a game simple, it will be a simple game. This isn't just for DOA & Tekken, it's every...

Tekken's complex with movement, dealing with inputs, That "Fend for yourself" mentality, Chaining combos, Some people have parries, low parries, environment (Not to the extreme of DOA), some characters have high execution, Combo's off lows, Combo's off Orbitals, Different stances, etc.

But then there's environment, different stuns, different guarantees and tech, some characters have OH's and special parries, Alpha's barebones on the defensive side, some characters have different stances and stuff to consider, chaining combos, etc.

1st off. They're both complex in their own ways. Anyone that say's DOA's simple is crazy. Yeah they got a bad rep a little for the fan service but that doesn't mean DOA is barebones. DOA has a lot of things for one to consider. The triangle system is enough to say that it's complex.

Sarah's a consideration. Not really for that reason. Mainly cause I want to have a Taekwondo squad for every 3d fighter (Though Sarah's not 100% Taekwondo).

Not that I want to punish everything. I don't want SS to be OP. If a string tracks then I can't utilize that. I also accept that I can't SS grabs. But the fact that non-tracking strings take sidestep away for me is cheesy and because the moves re-track makes SS weak compared to just standard...

And they're right. Heck I can't execute with Rig at a high level. I'm still learning. And same for Hwo in tekken. I just find it hilarious that people can just spew out their mouths that Rig/Hwo are so easy/mash friendly but have no concrete evidence to support that.

I remember people talking about why there isn't many Rig's in a tourney scenario? And Rig's debated as a top 5 character for the most part (I don't see it. I see top 10). And when someone said "After Hoodless, Jager, and Sypher who else can execute with Rig to a high caliber of potential in a...

Like "Hwo has easy launchers". Ok so can I Just frame skyrocket in plain sight and not worry about input lag and all that? I think anyone that says that about any of my characters don't know how to play them. They don't look to the level of execution that they have to use to excel in them.

Doesn't mean they're not hard or there aren't non-mashy players but they cater to that distinct style. 2nd to the cruise control: Its funny that people say that but when I question the logic, they have no answer.

Or my characters are easy cruise control. Like 1st with the mash: There's a distinction between having frame advantage and mashing. I consider people like Kasumi and such to be easy characters because those characters cater to beginners and since beginners typically mash, that's the people they...

And I'm not trying to say this outta hate or whatever. I know people love it the way it is and they have their reasons and it's respectable. But for me, I feel that that's a weak point that not only DOA, but Tekken needs to address.

That's basically my whole argument there. That because sidestepping isn't as effective as it should, for me, it's better to block and punish there, which I could do even in 2d fighters. People talk about 2d's being stiff and 3d has that distinction with their fighters but it's weak cause...