Search results

well in the demo it seems like just the one ... but again .. its a DEMO .. so .. yeah .. there were some awesome character specific ones .. like .. i think helena vs janlee .. if she beats him she says "うるさい人ね” ... i used to love that ... lol .. there were others like that as well ... im...

oh cool ! .. so im guessing the LONDON MCM (round end of this month) is gonna have just the alpha build then ... I few guys told me there was a doa5 thing going on there... meh ...

so when is E3 anyway ? isnt it like 2 months away or something ? >__> im not sure ..

as far as im concerened ... I think every one (minus ein n tengu) .. + 2 brand new guys + 3 vfs ... you know that combination is just sounding too awesome right now .. sarah was my secondary in vf and my main was kage .. so I really hope he gets to duke it out with the rest of the ninjas (even...

Im tellin u man.. ein is dlc along with a vf character or 2 or 3 (i hope) Give me kage n wolf n eileen n im set Ah... One can dream... I sure am gonna miss tengu tho... Him n leifang made a crazy tag team.. lol

Oh i see... Well good .. im really looking forward to the new blood ... Didnt the tecmo boss always have a robot fetish? I really hope we dont get a stupid robot... >__> Too bad we aint seein the spartan either.. she was a ton of fun.. Xbox exclusive dlc?? Mmmmmm one can wish... It...

what about that red head from beach volleyball ? i acctually thought shed be the first to make the new character list .. whatever her name was .. *searches the web...* Rio ... >___> strange she aint on the list .. guess japan didnt like her lol

i hope they dont show up ... at all infact ... costumes ? i wouldnt mind tho ... i just want my DOA ... with a nice seasoning of virtua fighter .. thank you ..

dont get me wrong... i never praised DOA4 ... it was FUN and I enjoyed it .. but it WAS broken as hell and i dont deny that one bit ... i still much prefer 3.1 .. for all the reasons you stated (god i miss that back setup for leifang >__> ) ... but then 3.1 had 3 point holds and it worked as...

hey rikuto .. (just to make a long story short) again personal opinion. - low hold + stand frames = not too bad of an idea ... however. i still prefer the old system on both the offensive and the defensive ... having it "double function" was always a good thing about it ... was it OP ? i...

well ... im just giving out my personal opinion here .. - but I think you should still be able to crouch with a low HOLD .. the recovery of it has changed and I think thats a good enough nerf .. im also pretty glad they made the hold animations so distinct now .. it really makes a world of a...

like I said .. adding the DOA:D boosts to strikes ... will balance it out .. without the removal of holds from stuns .. counter strike = auto mid height launch hi counter strike = auto heighest launch = no need to reach critical threshold normal launch = the current low height single stun...

the thing is .. the situation is not in that reverse ... I think skatan mentioned this best when he said stun does not mean "garanteed damage" in doa .. i mentioned before that stuns have varying times of start frames before allowing a next hold .. especially some cetrain stuns on counter hit...

i still feel the senario is quite different ... are you assuming that during your -15 frames you can basicly attack again ? meaning if you were to go for say a throw punish it would not be possible? and if you were to go for a strike punish it would likely to counter strike me ? how about...

hey man.. I should have been sightly clearer in my example .. (sorry this was my fault) .. Im assuming a situation where you're not exactly near the wall but can be smacked into it from the :K: follow up .. I think this makes it more clear ... in this situation you dont worry about the wall...

yes I do know EXACTLY what hes getting at which is EXACTLY why I elaborated specificly on what he said. the example is NOT the same. infact i LIKED his post when I read it because he was the only one here trying to make sense out of things even though it was a conflicting opinion to mine...

although I do like the idea of the reverse analogy I have to say I slightly disagree .. because you inserted BLOCKING into the equasion. and thats a totally different thing all together.. if he can cancel the attack .. then the attack is NOT unsafe. holds cannot be canceled and if they are...

hi again, you know I have no disrespect for you.. and we've chatted a few times on pm and even on this forum before.. and we disagreed almost 99% of the time .. yes ... but still held healthy conversations ... its not about who wins the conversation in the end .. its about how can you clearly...

im sorry but since when was pointing out someones background a valid part of this argument ... ? whats next ? ethnicity ? if thats your argument ... then i play games and on several occasions reached top 32 .. top 16 .. top 8 .. top 4 and even won.. and it wasnt DOA .. im talking about sf4...

thank you for changing the subject and admitting you were not 100 % right .. :P as for the izuna damage .. yes i agree 100% its too much... which is why i suggested the removal of "counters" from holds during stun... as for ayane .. well .. you can argue that her advanced holds give her...