Relius Starkiller
Active Member
I've been mulling this over in my head for years - the question as to why no one ever made an honest effort to assign a rank to the better players in this community.
There were enough of us and hindsight being what it is I think we can be a lot more candid on our personal takes on the skill of other players. I think back then everyone had a dog in the race but now that DOA 4 has died down quite a bit, I think something like this can be done without too many people getting butt hurt.
The list would have to be produced by a committee comprised of those who were around at the time, who were decent players themselves, competed against those in consideration and have a history of unbiased opinion when it came to any of the players who would make it into the discussion (That last part is a little tricky because I think at some point everyone was on everyones badside but we're adults here right? Sorta, kinda?).
I'm wondering would anyone be on board with helping me with an opinion piece of this type?
Don't all jump up at once.
There were enough of us and hindsight being what it is I think we can be a lot more candid on our personal takes on the skill of other players. I think back then everyone had a dog in the race but now that DOA 4 has died down quite a bit, I think something like this can be done without too many people getting butt hurt.
The list would have to be produced by a committee comprised of those who were around at the time, who were decent players themselves, competed against those in consideration and have a history of unbiased opinion when it came to any of the players who would make it into the discussion (That last part is a little tricky because I think at some point everyone was on everyones badside but we're adults here right? Sorta, kinda?).
I'm wondering would anyone be on board with helping me with an opinion piece of this type?
Don't all jump up at once.