(WWE) The Rock
- Thread starter Julius Rage
- Start date
Game Over
Well-Known Member
No one really cares. Because no one really watches TNA. So WWE is given no incentive to actually give a f*** about its product.
Game Over
Well-Known Member
Also doesn't matter. No respectable person listens to a guy like Glenn Beck with any amount of serious regard. Gotta love how they associate WWE to Linda McMahon as if she runs it. She doesn't run it, Vince runs it. She's just married to the guy who runs it. Politics. BULL****!!! And he OPENLY CALLS THE WWE AUDIENCE "stupid", and refers to "New York Elites" as if they don't have their own brand of scumbags! GTFO!!
I don't even have to watch the entire video to see it as a COMPLETE waste of my time!!!
R4712-VR88
Active Member
Game Over
Well-Known Member
And WWE continues to FAIL in restoring faith ...
Why can't they just LEAVE 'TAKER'S STREAK ALONE!?!?!? 20-0 is a good number to end on, and that last match with HHH was a good match to end on. There is NO POSSIBLE WAY for a match against Punk (who I like!) to top that match against HHH!!! 'Taker has been essentially GUARANTEED to win all of these matches since like #13, so there's really no more threat of him actually losing. If he DID lose, people would f***ing RIOT. And 20-0 is just SOOOOOOOOO much more of a "clean" number than 21-0. He's not going up to 30-0, so WHAT THE **** IS EVEN THE POINT!?!!??
WWE ... STAHP.
Also, F*** another HHH vs Lesnar match!!! Punk vs Lesnar would've been SOOOOOOO much more interesting.
Why can't they just LEAVE 'TAKER'S STREAK ALONE!?!?!? 20-0 is a good number to end on, and that last match with HHH was a good match to end on. There is NO POSSIBLE WAY for a match against Punk (who I like!) to top that match against HHH!!! 'Taker has been essentially GUARANTEED to win all of these matches since like #13, so there's really no more threat of him actually losing. If he DID lose, people would f***ing RIOT. And 20-0 is just SOOOOOOOOO much more of a "clean" number than 21-0. He's not going up to 30-0, so WHAT THE **** IS EVEN THE POINT!?!!??
WWE ... STAHP.
Also, F*** another HHH vs Lesnar match!!! Punk vs Lesnar would've been SOOOOOOO much more interesting.
Game Over
Well-Known Member
He doesn't.
And there's no one even left for him to fight who would be a "legitimate" threat to the streak except for Cena, but since he neither fought Hogan, Austin, or Rock at 'Mania, there is no reason AT ALL for him to fight Cena. Plus, WWE would likely make that match some BULL**** and have Cena win, and cause EVERY LEGIT FAN ON THE PLANET to RIOT!!!!!!
I'm just saying let Undertaker retire, and then have him and Paul Bearer inducted in the WWE Hall of Fame. Especially after hearing about this: http://www.ewrestlingnews.com/news/14413/breaking-news-paul-bearer-passes-away
Game Over
Well-Known Member
IMO, he should've retired soon after the last match with HHH. Having the last images of Undertaker as an "active roster" member being him, HHH, and HBK all making their way up the entrance way together would've been APPROPRIATELY HISTORIC.
Now, basically almost everything meaningful about that match, those moments, and the "End of an Era" ... is ruined.
Now, basically almost everything meaningful about that match, those moments, and the "End of an Era" ... is ruined.
Game Over
Well-Known Member
After two years of high flash Shawn Michaels ... and ESPECIALLY with the second being HYPE AS A MOFO "Streak vs Career" ... matches vs HHH were VERY ... shall we say ... underwhelming. Now, I'm not saying the HHH matches were bad, it's just his style generally has no flash or real excitement outside of certain stipulations.
First match vs HHH should've been something like "Last Man Standing", IMO. And even I will I say I GROANED at the idea of a rematch with them two, but they at least made it interesting by making Hell in a Cell with HBK in the mix ... where I'm GLAD they didn't **** up by having HBK actually cause 'Taker to lose!
Now, there is NO POSSIBLE WAY I CAN SEE for them to make Punk vs 'Taker NOT a waste of time!!
Yeah I felt like Undertaker should have retired AFTER Undertaker vs HBK the second time. The Undertaker vs HHH wasn't really a good match to go out on. It wasn't a BAD match just a bad WM match. Especially when the streak is involved and when the one before hand was a match of the year. I can see Punk vs Taker easily being better than Taker vs HHH.
I do agree they need to just retired Undertaker. He is old and his body is battered up at this point. He also look a lot less appealing now especially with his hair gone. He really do need to hang it up. Honestly there isn't a match I'm looking forward to at this WM. Only thing I can think of that can make this year WM exciting is if Cena was to turn heel.
Other than that Swagger vs Del Rio may be the only match worth looking forward to. I'm looking more forward to Mark Henry vs Ryback on this Smackdown over any of those WM matches.
I do agree they need to just retired Undertaker. He is old and his body is battered up at this point. He also look a lot less appealing now especially with his hair gone. He really do need to hang it up. Honestly there isn't a match I'm looking forward to at this WM. Only thing I can think of that can make this year WM exciting is if Cena was to turn heel.
Other than that Swagger vs Del Rio may be the only match worth looking forward to. I'm looking more forward to Mark Henry vs Ryback on this Smackdown over any of those WM matches.