I've seen adults worse, trust me.fucking brattiest 18 year old i've ever seen
If you're referring to the most recently talked about subject at hand in this thread - Marie Rose and her portrayed sexualization in this site being a negative impact for DOA to the public outside of its community - then I think I'm up to code.Not to sound like a pretentious twat, but most here don't even understand the nuances of the discussion, let alone consider the repercussions.
*waits for someone to come in and critique that statement without any clue what I'm referring to*
Not to sound like a pretentious twat, but most here don't even understand the nuances of the discussion, let alone consider the repercussions.
It's actually not nearly so acute, as I see it. This is just a manifestation of a larger sociological trend, one that's been seeing something of a resurgence as of late. People feel like by turning a blind eye, they'd be paving a trench down a road they don't want the "river" to flow (if that makes any sense). Essentially, each party is trying to put down a foot to shape the vox populi to fit a path they desire, and they use arguments of varying validity and efficiency to do so.If you're referring to the most recently talked about subject at hand in this thread - Marie Rose and her portrayed sexualization in this site being a negative impact for DOA to the public outside of its community - then I think I'm up to code.
But the question is do we try and make some sort of rule that, unless it is given a very lengthy description, will most likely be too vague to work (or be seen by the majority of members) or do we just handle it on a case by case basis?
Well...no, it's not like that at all. She didn't claim she's 18, the people who created the fictional universe in which she exists did. It'd be more along the lines of if you were at a club, and what ever being(s) or powers that be that you may or may not believe in came in to say, "She's 18, dude."@Blazeincarnated you keep on repeating this imho really stupid argument: But Team Ninja says, she's 18, so she's legal!
By the same argument the 13 year old girl in the club is actually legal, just because she claims to be 18. Yeah...I don't think so...
Does TN have to give you a document of evidence? What part of 18 do you not understand?What I meant:
Believing (or someone claiming) something to be true, doesn't make it true.
It doesn't matter. You and everyone else didn't bitch about it then, so why now? I know why... because TN wasn't active in social media back then for you to bitch to, therefore going to my first thought, is that people have opinions on things that are irrelevant and baseless. This is why I respect people like Ed Boon from Netherrealm because he actually doesn't care what people think over social media. He looks at people's tweets and ignores anything negative.Oh, so you are a psychic, knowing, what I was talking about back in the day!![]()
And again, you must be a psychic! I guess, then there's no point arguing about anything with you. You are omniscient after all!You and everyone else didn't bitch about it then, so why now?
And again, you must be a psychic! I guess, then there's no point arguing about anything with you. You are omniscient after all!![]()
The truth of the matter is, there wasnt really a two year time gap between doa4 and doa5.
The truth of the matter is, there wasnt really a two year time gap between doa4 and doa5 that was an excuse to make the characters socially acceptable for western players, its a form of censorship and it happens all the time when japanese games are localized (example. Bravely Default for 3ds). Its the same case for Marie Rose, had this been a japanese exclusive game she would not be 18.