No our arguments were over its current state and if should be allowed to release. i beleived those that want pure online play can buy it if they want and you wanted it delayed so they could add the single player stuff.
Argueing with you in here has been quite frustrating in the last couple of days... You don't really read what I'm writing, do you? That's why I so often have to ask what you are talking about when you replied to me.
Quote me saying the game had to be delayed! o__O I never said that. My point or points, to make it clear once again: Capcom released an unfinished product for full price.
They deliberately withheld two modes from the final game that are the most basic fighting game modes even though they already have them (versus mode against CPU was in Street Fighter 5 demo stations and in the beta) or even if it would take not much time at all to implement them (string together 8-10 CPU matches and voilà: arcade mode).
Last but not least they also deliberately withheld information about the game being half finished from the public. That only came out when some people got the game early and talked about it in forums. All Capcom ever said was that they would add some online modes later as well as challenges and another cinematic story mode. That is not saying: "Uhm, we cut all the staple modes of the Street Fighter series, hope you don't mind."
They don't have to delay anything. They should have called it early access or made it half the price, that would've been fair to all players. That's what I said. Here, let me quote myself:
They could have called and marketed it as an Early Access and they could've priced it lower. That would have been fair for all, no?
Is anything of what I said so insensible and outrageous that we had to argue about it for days?
Last edited: