Search results

Okay for those don't understand what Bryan is saying. . . . He's saying that because of how much you have to risk even at being +12 is insane in DoA. Basically you DO have options to punish someone for fighting out of disadvantage but your options are also unsafe so it's almost like why even...

Really. . . .that's what you got from everything he said. . . .lolz

The problem isn't the false mix up but that it's pretty much "Do I stop the string or do I continue?" It's very annoying to play a game where the main fighting tool is attack out of disadvantage because even IF you free cancel you have to decide do i go evasive, speed, or big. Then the opponent...

That isn't another layer that you are talking about. . . .it's the only layer when you are trying to break someone down. Throws are the only way to open someone up or throwing out a low sweep but sweeps don't give much of anything in DoA. Doing an attack and being at disadvantage and then...

The hold being able to be used in stun isn't the problem. It's the amount of times it is able to be used. Please actually read posts rather than read like 10 words and think you understand it. They have taken out 2-3 guesses that were in DoA4, we would like them to expand on this.

What he means is not that the frame trap doesn't work (well it didn't) but that it meant so little to him he decided to hit buttons and not even a launcher. He just started doing jabs because he simply didn't care because he knows the risk/reward is still even for it. He's not going to get...

If they added attacks that cause a stun that can't be countered on CH that would help the situation more. And I mean attacks other than the special moves that already cause that stun. For example I will use Hitomi, 6k - It doesn't cause the stun that can't be countered if the opponent is...

Whenever you block a low jab you are +5 advantage. That means unless they evade your quickest mid/jab will always win. It's basically how quick you are to react after blocking the low jab. Reversals in this game aren't very strong and are more of a tool to use if someone is being REALLY...

What's the i46?

Good games the other day guys! Let's do it again sometime. Allan - Pai has a mid 12 frame attack, you might wanna put that in your game lol. And careful of attacking out of disadvantage so much. Remember standing P is small advantage but PP is not. Same applies with 2p, gotta be careful of...

Then no one is talking about you genius. You are the weirdest person I have ever known, you literally just troll all day lol. I'm talking strictly giving someone a label as a strong competitor without that person competing. Saying, " Random X the online player would probably do well if he...

I honestly don't care enough I just want you to let it die lol. Caring what you do online means very little to me as I will spend most of my time offline so what is happening in your online world will mean very little to me. I will let those players believe whatever it is that they want to...

There's nothing to discuss. . . .I just said you're right lol. Do you want to be wrong?

Ok, everyone who plays online is just as good as offline players. I said it, I submit to the will of it. Sorry guys. Move on now?

You give credit where credit is due :)

That's just games bro. . .not just VF lolol

Why would we even want to go backwards? DoA:D is like 4 steps backwards lol The stun game is a joke in other DoA games, there is no reason to even go back to that.

Thanks Bryan.

That doesn't even make sense. I asked a very legit question and all you got is something to "try" and save face. I didn't even express anything, I just wanted to know how you can discuss DoA when you don't actually know anything :( From that comment though it's pretty obvious you know nothing...

What exactly are you discussing about the game? This is a serious question because you were pretty bad at DoA 4, you weren't good at any other fighter (to my knowledge anyway so correct me if I'm wrong), and you had very little knowledge of DoA 4. So I'm confused as to what you are actually...