I mean, c'mon, let's be real for a second here, alright? What's more likely?
A: Marie was a deliberate, conscious effort to be inclusive to women who happen to be petite and have major babyface.
B: They made a young girl character and then remembered she had to be at least 18 to meet various international standards.
Ultimately, the fact is that Marie, Honoka and NiCO were designed to look like young girls. Yes, there are adult women who look similar in real life, but the difference is that they weren't specifically designed to look that way with the explicit intent of getting people who are into their designs to spend money on them.
Also, it's no baseless accusation to say that the sexualization of minors is a very common thing in Japan. It's present in almost every anime and manga you can think of to varying degrees. Like, let's not ignore that Sword Art Online, for example, made a point of showing every one of its 12 to 17 year old heroines in their underwear at least once.
Let's be real then and let's use some logic:
C: You don't have to be some kind of genius to try a new kind of female character in this franchise. They designed a character completely opposite to all other DOA existing girls, a petite and flat chested girl. It worked and people asked for more.
The fact is that "young girls" is a baseless affirmation if you are trying to go the "minors" rute unless you can show us actual proofs about it.
And yes, accusing Marie, Honoka and NiCO fans of wanting these characters being minors is a baseless accusation. There are people in this forum that actually like these characters, if you are trying to keep your point then you are pointing at them and you know, if I were them, you should have to prove this in a court, just to show people that pointing random accusations isn't always free and people should think twice about what they are saying.
No, it's not. As I've already said, the trend of these characters very rarely has anyone actually being 18. A consequence of anime rarely leaving middle or high school. It's just common practice at this point. You can say that TN is trying to be original, but their big idea of originality also involves introducing a busty schoolgirl named Honoka who has the exact same hairstyle as another decently-known moe anime character named Honoka. And also NiCO swiping the aesthetic of another popular anime character with blue hair and a pink pin. And would you look at that, Love Live Honoka and Rem from Re:Zero aren't 18 either.
And it's not like TN had a problem with characters younger than 18 before they got slapped by Sweden. I've already copped to it being conjecture. But, it's not baseless. What exactly are you using to bolster your accusations, hm?.
What you have said in that exact quote is:
The people they're pandering to with these designs probably would prefer it if they weren't 18. But, TN insists.
Here you are pointing at people that like these characters and you are accusing them of prefering minors. There are people in this forum and in other forums that like these characters. So I will ask you this, are you willing to prove it?.
About coincidences with other Anime characters. Or you are acussing them of plagiarism, just changing names and ages or you maybe could consider that, with the absurd amount of characters out there, can exist coincidences like these.
If you are a fan of Final Fantasy you will probably know Lighting's (FF XIII) sister, Serah Farron.
Some people found that she actually looks ... almost identical to a hentai character, Kurumi Imari from Bible Black. Both of them are young, both of them have a similar hair style and hair color, both of them wear high school clothes with almost identical colours so ... Did Square Enix just want to push a hentai character in Final Fantasy?.
It's not having that effect. It's just making them look stupid. There's no "desperation" involved in thinking that the trio need to have their ID's checked as it were. It's just that people who have seen these archetypes 100 times before know what the conventions are. And they have a general sense of what 18-year-olds look and act like. It was a foregone conclusion that introducing characters that look and act younger than the 18-year-olds already established would get pegged as "18".
It's having that effect in people like me, that have a really fun time reading all these mental gymnastics to "prove" their claims. And people that claim that both Marie Rose, Honoka and NiCO are the same character archetype probably don't have a clue about scripts.
The situation was already rectified by the option to turn it off. Implemented in the game since at least September of last year. They don't have to listen to unreasonable demands if they don't want to. And think about why fans would've had that reaction to those characters specifically. There must be something about them.
We agree that changing the camera for everyone is just dumb, that's why I opened this thread. Where we don't agree is this has something to do with these characters being minors in their minds.
In drawing comparison to Marie, it's already a comment on how young Marie looks. And Marie's entire shtick doesn't work unless you possibly think she's a minor. They weren't going for a 35-year-old that looks 20. They created an 18-year-old that looks and acts younger than that. Younger than 18 would be a minor. And NiCO was going to follow the same gameplan before they decided they were better off making her a nerd with chunibyo poses because DOAXVV saw fit to add more super moe kawaii 18-year-olds. Heaven forbid they actually did decide to port them over, too. We'd have like 7. lol
Where you keep surprising me is you still keep claiming that someone at certatin age should look in a certain way. Marie isn't a 18 year old girl that looks like a "18" year old girl, she's a 18 year old girl that look like a 18 year old girl. That's a fact.
You don't have to be a genius or some kind of super progressive artist to draw it.
Marie inclusion in DOA was a risk move, she could have failed because until then, everyone just expected "busty girls", whatever their age or origin are. She is completely opposite to all other previous female characters, that's why her body is like that.
That's a funny joke. Everything down to her manner of speaking was crafted to be child-like.
Not everything, you can see her initial description hinting a "dark side" and some intros and win poses with a serious talk. She being disappointing in DOA 6 story mode is another thing (like the whole story mode imo).
You're being dumb on purpose. Cut it out. These terms were not disingenuously created for an agenda. They were created to describe existing character trends. And a term for male-loli already exists. It's called a shota. lol
Oppai loli is a term used to make fun of these characters, just like others similar terms. They are not used to objectively describe nothing since the whole purpose is the over-exaggeration.
And yes, I was being sarcastic with male-loli, since it makes so much sense as oppai-loli.
Obviously, Honoka and NiCO are not Phase-4 clones of Marie. No one is seriously claiming that. But, you seem to have already acknowledged that they were created as a response to riff off of Marie's popularity. They must be close enough to Marie for that connection to be apparent to pretty much everyone. They are all outliers in a similar way. You can take any one specific item by itself and write it off as coincidence ("they all look young"). But, you can't do that. You have to look at all the pieces together. You can plausibly have a barely 18 character that looks like a kid. But, you can't just keep adding them over and over again and then act shocked and appalled that people think you have ulterior motives.
What I have been saying is that NiCO is a answer to Marie Rose success and like I said several messages ago, her success is due being different to all classic female characters, not being a "18" character. Even Nyotengu is actually more popular than most of the older female characters and her appeal isn't being "18" is being a "yokai girl" with a really sensual personality.