Fictional injury is not abuse. Mutual combat is also not abuse, strangeman.Neglecting to abuse women is not sexist, strangeman.
It is impossible to argue two ways.Fictional injury is not abuse. Mutual combat is also not abuse, strangeman.
If you believe either of those not to be the case, than you must believe every fighting game ever is abuse.
Adding cuts/bruises does not make it "realistic." It might make it slightly more realistic, but so does giving characters breathing animations, and no one is upset about that.It is impossible to argue two ways.
You will have fiction, and say anything goes, but at the same time want realism.
This doesn't work. Older DOA work as fictional fighting games without blood and bruises. If we insist fiction, why require realism? It is more fictional for girls to not bleed. So what is good? More fiction, or more reality?
Even despite warning you still try to hide behind fiction while wishing for realism.Adding cuts/bruises does not make it "realistic." It might make it slightly more realistic, but so does giving characters breathing animations, and no one is upset about that.
Everyone has a different balance of fictional portrayals of things that are inspired by reality and they prefer these in different degrees. Just because something emphasizes more or less of a particular element doesn't make it abuse. It's still fiction.
If you think that depicting injury against women in a fictional medium is inherently "abuse," then all past DOA games qualify.
If you think that depicting injury against women in a fictional medium is inherently "abuse," then all past DOA games qualify.
Yes, fiction is fine. This is all fiction. The men are fictional. The women are fictional. The violence is fictional. The blood is fictional.In this thread pretend it is realistic for women to be effective fighter but is fictional for women not to bleed.
Brain problems.
Sexism does not cause a man to have large muscles. Sexism does not cause a woman to be petite. This is reality and has no opinion. Women should not be abused by men because they are fragile and cannot beat men in reality, but woman could beat men in fiction. You agree this is video game and not real, so you agree fiction is fine. You accept it is fiction for woman to be effective fighter. You play and enjoy fiction game with fantasy instead of realism. So why realism face bruise and women bleeding?
I wish you'd stop lying.I leave this thread now
Too many words to pretend you are smart.Yes, fiction is fine. This is all fiction. The men are fictional. The women are fictional. The violence is fictional. The blood is fictional.
Here's a "brain problem" for you:
The men in this game are depicted as having "large muscles."
The women are depicted as "petite."
As you said: "This is reality and has no opinion."
Thus, the games are "realistic" even without the face bruising so long as they visually depict this "real" phenomenon.
I'm literally going to write out your proposed logic for you in modus ponens format because I get the feeling you've never studied logic:
Your Argument:
Premise 1: If game contains a realistic depiction of something (if A), then it is realistic (then B).
Premise 2: DOA contains bruising, which is realistic (A).
Conclusion: DOA is realistic (therefore: B) merely by containing bruising.
My Counter-Example (that must also be true if the above is true):
Premise 1: If game contains a realistic depiction of something (if A), then it is realistic (then B).
Premise 2: DOA contains men having different body types than women, which is realistic (A).
Conclusion: DOA is realistic (therefore: B) merely by containing different body types.
So why is "realism face bruise and women bleeding" not okay when "realistic different-gendered body types" are okay? Because all fiction is based in reality and it's completely subjective what parts of it you want to see represented.
If you are opposed to any depiction of something that may represent something "realistic," then you would be opposed to the depiction of male and female characters having different body types.
I wish you'd stop lying.
Too many to pretend? I guess it's a good thing I wasn't pretending. I suppose this means that there was a sufficient supply of words to alleviate any doubt that my intellect was anything but genuine.Too many words to pretend you are smart.
That's not an argument. It's an incorrect recollection of events where "logic" was bizarrely replaced by the term "brain issue" and you cherry-picked what qualities you consider to be acceptable based on an inconsistent definition of "realistic."The argument is as such:
▪I feel blood should not be part of the game, but if in final game it should be default OFF and optional.
▪someone have brain issue and take strange offense from my comment about punching girls in the face being mean, to call it sexist.
▪I say "not-punching women isn't sexist"
▪you join and say its all fiction and imply fiction means its okay to rough up women in realistic ways such as beating face to bruises and blood
▪you wish to see realism depictions in fiction because brain problems
▪however we embrace concept of fiction being fantasy, where a dainty thin kunoichi may defeat a fit JKD martial artist.
▪you must strawman and misdirect to distract that you keep digging hole insisting realistic depictions of women abuse are not meant to be understood realistically. This invalidates want for realistic depictions however. Why make fiction appear realistic if not because you want it to appear more realistic and less fictional?
This question was apparent twice before this post.
Mortal Kombat is actually very popular, whether you like it or not.Bad taste game like Mortal Kombat is not popular though.
I think more people are confused at what you're saying, hardly anything you say makes sense, I have to reread your posts like this one like 3-4 times to make sure I'm reading your statements correctly >_>None has involved bruises or blood.
You are not just saying anything.
Many people have become confused to like that post. There was no sense.
The blood is just a screen effect and the bruising looks pretty tame and superficial so far.None has involved bruises or blood.
You are not just saying anything.
Many people have become confused to like that post. There was no sense.